Home >> Inventory Accounting Summary
The Last-in, First-out Method | LIFO Inventory Method
Overview of the Last-in, First-out Method
The LIFO method of inventory valuation assumes that the last goods purchased are the first goods used or sold. This allows the matching of current costs with current revenues and provides the best measure of gross profit. However, unless costs remain relatively unchanged over time, the LIFO method will usually misstate the ending inventory balance sheet amount because LIFO inventory usually includes costs of acquiring or manufacturing inventory that were incurred in earlier periods. LIFO does not usually follow the physical flow of merchandise or materials. However, the matching of physical flow with cost flow is not an objective of accounting for inventories.
Under the LIFO method, the quantity of ending inventory on hand at the beginning of the year of election is termed the base layer. This inventory is valued at actual (full absorption) cost, and unit cost for each inventory item is determined by dividing total cost by the quantity on hand. At the end of the initial and subsequent years, increases in the quantity of inventory on hand are referred to as increments, or LIFO layers. These increments are valued individually by applying one of the following costing methods to the quantity of inventory representing a layer:
- The actual cost of the goods most recently purchased or produced
- The actual cost of the goods purchased or produced in order of acquisition
- An average unit cost of all goods purchased or produced during the current year
- A hybrid method that more clearly reflects income
Thus, after using the LIFO method for five years, it is possible that an enterprise could have ending inventory consisting of the base layer and five additional layers (or increments) provided that the quantity of ending inventory increased every year.
Example of the Last-in, First-out Method
The single goods (unit) LIFO approach is illustrated in the following example:
Rose Co. is in its first year of operation and elects to use the periodic LIFO method of inventory valuation. The company sells only one product. Rose applies the LIFO method using the order of current year acquisition cost. The following data are given for years 1 through 3:
| Units | Purchase cost | |||||
| Year 1 | Beginning inventory | Purchased | Sold | Ending inventory | Unit cost | Total cost |
| Purchase | 200 | $2.00 | $400 | |||
| Sale | 100 | ___ | ___ | |||
| Purchase | 200 | 3.00 | 600 | |||
| Sale | ___ | ___ | 150 | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| __ |
400 | 250 | 150 | |||
| Year 2 | ||||||
| Purchase | 300 | $3.20 | $960 | |||
| Sale | 200 | ___ | ___ | |||
| Purchase | ___ | 100 | ___ | ___ | 3.30 | 330 |
| 150 | 400 | 200 | 350 | |||
| Year 3 | ||||||
| Purchase | 100 | $3.50 | $350 | |||
| Sale | 200 | ___ | ___ | |||
| Sale | ___ | ___ | 100 | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| 350 | 100 | 300 | 150 | |||
In year 1 the following occurred:
- The total goods available for sale were 400 units
- The total sales were 250 units
- Therefore, the ending inventory was 150 units
The ending inventory is valued at the earliest current year acquisition cost of $2.00 per unit. Thus, ending inventory is valued at $300 (150 × $2.00).
Another way to look at this is to analyze both cost of goods sold and ending inventory.
| Units | Unit cost | Total cost | |
| Cost of goods sold | 200 | $3.00 | $600 |
| 50 | 2.00 | 100 | |
| 250 | $700 | ||
| Ending inventory | 150 | 2.00 | $300 |
Note that the base-year cost is $2.00 and that the base-year level is 150 units. Therefore, if ending inventory in the subsequent period exceeds 150 units, a new layer (or increment) will be created.
| Year 2 | Units | Unit cost | Total cost | |
| Cost of goods sold | 100 | $3.30 | $330 | |
| 100 | 3.20 | 320 | ||
| 200 | $650 | |||
| Ending inventory | 150 | 2.00 | $300 | Base-year layer |
| 200 | 3.20 | 640 | Year 2 increment | |
| 350 | $940 |
If ending inventory exceeds 350 units in the next period, a third layer (increment) will be created.
| Year 3 | Units | Unit cost | Total cost | |
| Cost of goods sold | 100 | $3.50 | $350 | |
| 200 | 3.20 | 640 | ||
| 300 | $990 | |||
| Ending inventory | 150 | 2.00 | $300 | Base-year layer |
Notice how the decrease (decrement) of 200 units in year 3 eliminated the entire year 2 increment. Thus, any year 4 increase in the quantity of inventory would result in a new increment which would be valued at year 4 prices.
In situations where the ending inventory decreases from the level established at the close of the preceding year, the enterprise experiences a decrement or LIFO liquidation. Decrements reduce or eliminate previously established LIFO layers. Once any part of a LIFO layer has been eliminated, it cannot be reinstated after year-end.
For example, if in its first year after the election of LIFO an enterprise establishes a LIFO layer (increment) of ten units, then in the next year inventory decreases by four units leaving the first layer at six units, the enterprise is not permitted in any succeeding year to increase the number of units in the first year layer back up to the original ten units. The quantity in the first layer remains at a maximum of six units subject to further reduction if decrements occur in future years. Any unit increases in future years will create one or more new layers. The effect of LIFO liquidations in periods of rising prices is to transfer, from ending inventory into cost of goods sold, costs that are below the current cost being paid. Thus, the resultant effect of a LIFO liquidation is to increase income for both accounting and income tax purposes. Because of this, LIFO is most commonly used by companies in industries in which levels of inventories are consistently maintained or increased over time.
Related Topics
FIFO vs. LIFO accounting
First-in first-out method
Specific identification method
Weighted average method
What are perpetual LIFO and periodic LIFO?

